The Natura 2000 framework plays an important role in protecting Europe’s biodiversity, and its goal of safeguarding vulnerable habitats and species is widely supported. However, it has been noticed that it sometimes applies too rigidly. The experiences of Fejø, Venø, and other small Danish islands show a growing tension between two national priorities: protecting nature on one side and advancing the green transition on the other side.
Danish islands are not just passive recipients of national policy; they are practical examples of innovation, self-sufficiency, and community-driven climate action. However, under the current approval system, their plans to replace outdated wind turbines and contribute to national climate goals are often slowed or blocked by complex procedures, even when the projects pose minimal environmental risk. A more predictable and proportionate framework is needed to ensure that these low-risk initiatives can move forward without unnecessary administrative barriers.
This position paper shows that a more proportionate approach is necessary and fully allowed under the existing EU rules. A small, citizen-led project on farmland with no sensitive species should not face the same requirements as a large commercial wind development. If this distinction is not made, the system risks becoming stuck and ineffective.